Lusaka | August 17, 2026 – The National Prosecution Authority (NPA) this morning opened its doors to a Ugandan delegationwhich is in the country to benchmark Zambia’s approach to witness protection. Led by Ms. Jeroline Akubu (Assistant Commissioner, Uganda Law Reform Commission), the delegation includes Mr. Musa Modoi (JLOS), Ms. Irene Bajiga, Ms. Sheila Ampeire Lisamofa, and Mr. Lazaka Tibakuno, all from the Attorney General’s Chambers. Ms. Akubu previously visited on July 16, 2026 as part of a different delegation that was tasked with studying offender identification law. Received by the Learned Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Mr. Gilbert A. Phiri, SC, at NPA headquarters, the technical session ran well past midday. In the day’s technical session, Deputy Chief State Advocate (DCSA) for Lusaka Province, Mr. Frank Mupenzani Sikazwe, his deputy Principal State Advocate Mrs. Monde Muyoba-Chizongo, DCSAfor Gender Based

Lusaka | August 13, 2026 – The Learned Director of Public Prosecutions, Mr. Gilbert A. Phiri SC, yesterday, August 12, 2026, received a delegation from the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Zambia, who paid a courtesy call on him at the National Prosecution Authority Headquarters. The WWF delegation, led by Ms. Nalucha Nganga-Ziba, Country Director, was at the NPA to explore areas of possible collaboration and partnership in capacity building issues of strengthening the prosecution of environmental and wildlife crimes in Zambia. During the meeting, the two institutions discussed the growing threat of environmental crimes, including illegal wildlife trafficking, illegal timber trade, capacity building issues of research and evidence gathering, and other crimes that threaten Zambia’s biodiversity and natural heritage. In his remarks, the Learned Director of Public Prosecutions welcomed the delegation and restated the Authority’s commitment to combating

Lusaka | August 10, 2026 – The Lusaka Magistrates’ Court has found Mr. Raphael Nakachinda with a case to answer in a matter where he faces charges of expressing hatred, ridicule and contempt based on tribe and place of origin, contrary to the Penal Code. Magistrate Hon. Sinvula delivered the ruling this morning, holding that the prosecution had established a prima facie case sufficient to place the accused on his defence. It is alleged that in April 2022, Mr. Nakachinda uttered remarks to the effect that Zambians had picked “the most ignorant person from Bweengwa” and taken him to State House. He denies the charge. At this stage, the court is not deciding guilt. It is determining whether the State has led sufficient evidence that, if unchallenged, could sustain a conviction. Had the evidence been insufficient, the accused would have

Lusaka | August 6, 2026 – In a ruling that highlights the judiciary’s stance on national security rhetoric, the Lusaka Magistrate’s Court has convicted and sentenced Raphael Nakacinda on a charge of seditious practices. Magistrate Sylvia Munyinya handed down a fine of K2,400, ordering immediate payment or default imprisonment of three months. The conviction stems from public utterances made in September 2024, in which Nakacinda alleged that law enforcement agencies were planning a raid on the Chifwema residence of the late former President Edgar Lungu. The prosecution argued that these remarks, made amid heightened political tension, had the potential to incite public alarm and disrupt the peace. The court’s ruling places a spotlight on the intersection of political speech and national security, with the bench emphasising the threshold for legitimate political expression versus actionable sedition. The verdict is likely to

Lusaka | August 5, 2026 – In a harrowing case that has laid bare the devastating reality of child sexual abuse in Zambia, a 45-year-old man has been convicted of incest after the court heard how he repeatedly defiled his biological Grade 1 daughter, resulting in the ten-year-old contracting HIV. The Lusaka Resident Magistrate Court on August 6, 2026, found the accused guilty of incest contrary to Section 159(1) of the Penal Code. The matter has been referred to the High Court for sentencing after the subordinate court ruled it lacked jurisdiction to impose a penalty in such grave circumstances. “This court has no doubt that the accused person is guilty,” Resident Magistrate Kawama stated in her ruling. “The evidence presented by the prosecution is so overwhelming that it offsets any prejudice that might have arisen from the investigation.” The