ca@npa.gov.zm

-


+26 0211375600/ Toll Free - 3737

-

Magistrate Defies Pule’s Recusal Bid, Questions His Choice of Lawyers as Prosecution Triumph

WhatsApp Image 2024-06-13 at 4.28.26 PM

Lusaka, Zambia –
Magistrate Sylvia Munyinya has upheld the highest standards of judicial integrity by dismissing Dan Pule’s recusal bid, despite allegations of tribal bias. The court’s ruling reaffirms the judiciary’s commitment to impartiality and justice in Zambia.

Pule, the controversial spiritual leader of the United Kwacha Alliance (UKA), had sought to remove Magistrate Munyinya from his seditious case, citing apprehensions of unfair trial due to her ethnic background. However, the magistrate’s firm stand demonstrates the judiciary’s resolute commitment to judicial integrity, even in the face of bias allegations.

Magistrate Munyinya’s ruling highlighted the importance of substantiating allegations of bias with convincing evidence, rather than mere suspicions or apprehensions. She stated, “Recusal is a crucial ethical responsibility that a judicial officer must consider carefully, as Section 6 of the Penal Code sets the standards for judicial officers.”

The magistrate’s decision to dismiss Pule’s recusal bid is proof to her firm commitment to judicial integrity. By upholding the highest standards of impartiality, Magistrate Munyinya has reinforced and validated the judiciary’s role in ensuring justice is served without fear or favour.

Highlighting Hypocrisy in Legal Representation

Magistrate Munyinya’s ruling also exposed the hypocrisy in Pule’s legal representation. She noted that Pule’s lawyers hail from the same region he claimed would bias her against him, raising questions about the sincerity of his concerns.

Firm Stance Against Contemptuous *Behaviour

The magistrate also took a firm stance against contemptuous behavior by Pule’s defence team, criticising their discourteous submissions and emphasising the importance of respectful conduct in court.

Implications for the Case

This ruling sets a strong precedent for future cases, reaffirming the judiciary’s commitment to judicial integrity and impartiality. The trial is set to begin on July 25, and the prosecution is prepared to present its case robustly. This ruling marks a significant victory for the prosecution and an endorsement of the judiciary’s role in upholding justice without fear or favour.

Who we are

The National Prosecution Authority is a statutory body established by the National Prosecution Authority act No. 34 of 2010 with a mandate of instituting criminal proceedings on behalf of the state.

Recent Posts

Follow Us

REGISTRATION

National Annual Prosecutors Conference 2024

The Conference is open to all prosecutors across the country.

Please upload a clear image for your attendace identification card. Ensure the image uploaded matches the image sizing on the right to avoid the registration being rejected.

Please concider the following instructions.

  1. Ensure clean white background
  2. Use clear camera with detail
  3. Position your head straight while facing the camera
image sample